Interesting that they can detect everybody else’s flaws but their own. Look at how much time they spend, coordinating and plotting, and participating with one another. Why are they soooo emotional about this if their is no connection??? Their behavior falsifies their arguments because you see they are obviously emotional about the topic. Look at how much time they spend obsessing over it. They aren’t interested in conversation, relationship, understanding, or participation. They are only interested in arguments that they can win. That is the form of their conquest that they require, that is what makes them feel good about themselves.
What stimulated their need recognition to need to feel superior to others, and to avoid conversations with people like me, a deist, that can actually explain the bridge between religiosity and science? They edit their consideration sets to exclude evidence and arguments that prove them wrong. They are only looking for arguments in which they can win, that is the form of their conquest. Just like Dawkins, who avoids debates that he can’t win, yeah, he refuses to debate people he knows he can’t beat.
Notice how they believe themselves to be good in their actions and justified in everything they do. No guilt, or shame reflex, no humility. They presuppose their own goodness and their moral authority to judge and harass others.
Atheist Logic Fail 
March 27, 2014 at 2:57 am
Awww, Joxua. I feel left out!
Where’s my love, man?
March 27, 2014 at 5:46 pm
I am allowing you to comment because you haven’t been using ad hominem and cursing.
March 31, 2014 at 11:41 pm
Joxua, all I will say on the matter is that there are people like you out there that necessitate us helping others argue more effectively. You disparage people, seek to disenfranchise them, and you do it in the most dishonest ways possible. What you did by applauding good advice and then calling it a “Fail” is the height of intellectual dishonesty. I implore you to adopt a less combative tone if you do not wish one in return. If a fight is what you’re after though… you’ll get it if you keep looking for it like this.
Good day.
March 31, 2014 at 11:45 pm
There is no need for reasonable people to fight. only when one person refuses to be reasonable. And I would expect a fundamentalist Atheist such as yourself to be looking for a fight, since Dawkinites are a religious cult, and not scientists. Evil people like your fascist self are responsible for what they do. Nobody else is responsible for what you do. And your gods will get no homage from me. I am a deist and my god is reason.