Atheist Logic Fail


How they think…



Interesting that they can detect everybody else’s flaws but their own.  Look at how much time they spend, coordinating and plotting, and participating with one another.  Why are they soooo emotional about this if their is no connection???  Their behavior falsifies their arguments because you see they are obviously emotional about the topic.  Look at how much time they spend obsessing over it.  They aren’t interested in conversation, relationship, understanding, or participation.  They are only interested in arguments that they can win.  That is the form of their conquest that they require, that is what makes them feel good about themselves.  

What stimulated their need recognition to need to feel superior to others, and to avoid conversations with people like me, a deist, that can actually explain the bridge between religiosity and science?  They edit their consideration sets to exclude evidence and arguments that prove them wrong.  They are only looking for arguments in which they can win, that is the form of their conquest.  Just like Dawkins, who avoids debates that he can’t win, yeah, he refuses to debate people he knows he can’t beat.  

Notice how they believe themselves to be good in their actions and justified in everything they do.  No guilt, or shame reflex, no humility.  They presuppose their own goodness and their moral authority to judge and harass others.  


Author: Joxua Luxor

Known by his online handle Shivah Solomon, he paints as Joxua Mourningstar, he teaches Martial Tai Chi as Master Ten Ton Tiger, writing on occult mysteries he is known as Rabbi Ba'al Shiva, he writes philosophical fiction as Shivastus Solomonicus, and he does comedy as Adam Wolfe.

4 thoughts on “How they think…

  1. Awww, Joxua. I feel left out!
    Where’s my love, man?

  2. Joxua, all I will say on the matter is that there are people like you out there that necessitate us helping others argue more effectively. You disparage people, seek to disenfranchise them, and you do it in the most dishonest ways possible. What you did by applauding good advice and then calling it a “Fail” is the height of intellectual dishonesty. I implore you to adopt a less combative tone if you do not wish one in return. If a fight is what you’re after though… you’ll get it if you keep looking for it like this.

    Good day.

    • There is no need for reasonable people to fight. only when one person refuses to be reasonable. And I would expect a fundamentalist Atheist such as yourself to be looking for a fight, since Dawkinites are a religious cult, and not scientists. Evil people like your fascist self are responsible for what they do. Nobody else is responsible for what you do. And your gods will get no homage from me. I am a deist and my god is reason.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s