Atheist Logic Fail

learn2science

Professor Picklesmooch falsifies himself.

4 Comments

richard dawkins

Early in 2015 I wrote a short story about the Moral Equivalency of Atheists and cannibalism as an homage to the Argumentum Reductio ad Absurdum which was frequently used by an Atheist philosopher who I much respect.  I noticed that Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins were using a fallacious argument suggesting that Atheists can be moral because they can cherry pick their morals.  The problem, however, is that Atheists can never generate a morality or a Law Code because they can’t agree upon anything but the fact that God doesn’t exist.  So they have no Highest Form of their Good.  If there was a Big Book of Atheist Morals then Atheism would be re-categorized as a “Religion”.  Both of them were smart enough to know what they were doing.  Furthermore, they were doing it consciously and intentionally. (CLICK HERE FOR SHORT STORY)

Richard Dawkins destroyed his reputation when he exposed himself as being pro-pedophilia.  He recently came out in response to new research suggesting that “Clean Meat” can be grown in laboratories by asking when we can eat Human Meat.  I get that he is sexually aroused by science because his teacher molested him at a young age in a British school system, but he is also expressing a contempt for Western values which he himself acknowledged when he said, “I have mixed feelings about the decline of Christianity. I feel it might be a bulwark against something far worse (Islam).”

He really has nothing to fear.  He has already had a stroke and he is on his way out of this world. He conflated his sexual arousal with science with his teacher.  He is now trying to pass on his disease and his contempt of moral values to future generations.

Still you have to realize, just because human meat is grown in a lab, that doesn’t mean you won’t still get prion disease from eating your own kind.  It is Sadistic and disgusting.  As Tucker Carlson says, “The Revolution always eats itself”.  We would be reduced to having the same diseases as the people in Syria, Pakistan, and Papua New Guinea who also eat their own brothers and sisters.     

 

 

Advertisements

Author: Joxua Luxor

Known by his online handle Shivah Solomon, he paints as Joxua Mourningstar, he teaches Martial Tai Chi as Master Ten Ton Tiger, writing on occult mysteries he is known as Rabbi Ba'al Shiva, he writes philosophical fiction as Shivastus Solomonicus, and he does comedy as Adam Wolfe.

4 thoughts on “Professor Picklesmooch falsifies himself.

  1. Atheists tend to be people who harbor deep dark secrets, which go against the God of the Bible, or just about any religious morality, and as such hate religion and God… As a way to feel better about their dark impulses and desires (no God, no judgment, free to do and be whatever they want). In this case, the guy approves of pedophilia and cannibalism. and who knows what other warped thing.

  2. “The problem, however, is that Atheists can never generate a morality or a Law Code”

    So why is it that mostly atheist and Buddhist (which doesn’t require a belief in a god) East Asian countries like Japan and South Korea have among the lowest crime index, while mostly Catholic South American countries have among the highest crime index?
    https://www.numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp?title=2016

    Furthermore, China is the longest-running civilization in the world—with over 3,500 years of written history– while Western civilizations keep rising and crumbling in moral decay. This suggests, if anything, western religion is inferior at maintaining a stable civilization.

    The claim that belief in an invisible sky wizard influences ethical behavior is unfounded and irrational. East Asian countries prove that a stable, ethical societies can be founded on philosophy and godless religions as well, and perhaps do a better job at it since they don’t have to deal with the unnecessary burden of trying to sell people on something that can’t be proven in order to teach them a moral code.

    Also, Richard Dawkins does not represent all atheists and non-religious people. Non-religion is the third largest “religion” in the world — it is quite normal and harmless.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s