Do you remember that movie about how Awesome it is to be an Atheist? Do you remember that Awe-Inspiring book about Atheist Morals & the Philosophy behind them? Do you Remember that once Great Atheist Civilization? Atheism isnāt New it is old. Socrates was accused in court of being an Atheist & eventually given the death penalty. He denied it vehemently and defended himself brilliantly. There is a reason you donāt remember these things and that reason is because they never happened. Atheism has never succeeded and will never succeed and I know why.
Atheists canāt make Moral Judgements because they are not a Religion. If they were aMoral Authority they would be a Religion. This would be Self Falsifying.
There are no Universal Atheist Morals & if there are please direct me to them.
Atheists canāt create a Government because they canāt agree on any Morals which would create the Laws for that Nation.
Atheism is not Science.
Being an Atheist doesnāt make you more Intelligent than other people.
Atheists have nothing in common but the absence of the presence of a belief in God.
If Innate Morality exists it was created through a Religious Force that people exerted on themselves which created the Neural Myelination which was passed on through Epigenetics, creating that Innate Morality.
Atheists suggest that Atheism is not a belief. This is how they avoid Criticism while Criticizing. They donāt want to believe that they live in a Glass House while being Rock Throwing Enthusiasts, they prefer to believe that they live in an Invisible House, but the WANNABE TYRANT is wearing no clothes.
Atheists use the Argument that Atheism is not a belief. They, Stupidly try to Justify this by suggesting that not believing God exists is not a Belief. If they were Linguistic Philosophers they would know how Stupid they sound to Intelligent ears.
I (+) believe God does not (-)Ā exist.
is a Rhetorical Tautology ofā¦
I do not (-) believe God (+)Ā exists.
Atheism is a belief, PERIOD.
Richard Dawkins said, āI am 99.9% positive that God doesnāt exist.ā because he canāt state scientifically with any credibility that he is 100% sure God doesnāt exist. If he could state that, he would possess all knowledge in the Universe, thus being Omniscient, in which case he would be God, and therefore he would Falsify his own statement by being God. Omniscient, Omnipresent, and Omnipotent.
Known by his online handle Shivah Solomon, he paints as Joxua Mourningstar, he teaches Martial Tai Chi as Master Ten Ton Tiger, writing on occult mysteries he is known as Rabbi Ba'al Shiva, he writes philosophical fiction as Shivastus Solomonicus, and he does comedy as Adam Wolfe.
10 thoughts on “šThe Atheist Nothing Burgerš”
“Atheists canāt make Moral Judgements because they are not a Religion. If they were a Moral Authority they would be a Religion. This would be Self Falsifying.”
– Utter w*nk. Anyone can make moral judgments as long as they have a moral system (e.g. utilitarianism) which they follow. You don’t need a God to make moral judgments. What a stupid thing to say.
“There are no Universal Atheist Morals & if there are please direct me to them.”
– Unlike, of course, the complete Christian consensus on subjects such as condom use and abortion. Whether or not you believe in God (and of course it has to be the right one, doesn’t it? I can see how you feel about Islam), morality is difficult and complex, and if there is one moral absolute that the entire world agrees with and practices in the same way then I’d be staggered. That isn’t an argument for cultural relativism – it’s an admission that morality is more complicated than a neo-Nazi holding a ‘God Hates Fags’ sign makes it out to be. In fact, Westboro baptist is a pretty good example of the fact that there don’t appear to be many Universal Christian Morals either…
“Atheists canāt create a Government because they canāt agree on any Morals which would create the Laws for that Nation.”
– I don’t want to be rude, but this really is a stupid argument. Morality is independent of religion. YOU DON’T NEED TO BE RELIGIOUS TO ESTABLISH A SYSTEM OF MORALITY. Whether you believe morals stem from self-interest, psychological need for community and shelter, some innate moral sense, pure reason, God, or a combination of any and all – it is possible to agree on moral norms within communities, and establish systems of government, without needing religion. There are now more atheists than believers in the UK and yet weirdly we haven’t collapsed into anarchy.
“Atheism is not Science.”
– No one said it was (other than straw men).
“Being an Atheist doesnāt make you more Intelligent than other people.”
– No one said it did (ditto).
“Atheists have nothing in common but the absence of the presence of a belief in God.”
– Unlike Christians, who are all identical in thought and belief? Were you high when you wrote this?!
Your entire point was made much more eloquently by Dostoevsky who stated that without God, everything is permissible. Of course, it isn’t true (and D didn’t really think it was). We might even argue that to be good even without the promise of eternal reward is rather better than being good so you can go to heaven…
If you understand the concept of Praxis, which you don’t, you can’t assume an authority that you don’t possess. You can falsify your Philosophy by following it and it is wrong or you can falsify your philosophy by not following it. If you don’t state your philosophy, you don’t have a soul because you aren’t at rational human being. You are arbitrary, and therefore an anarchist tyrant.
Your second comment was a red herring with an arbitrary comparison set in order to make your Non-Answer look viable. I wasn’t impressed at all. I don’t respond to cowardly leading questions or red herrings. Only assertions that don’t conceal their agenda.
> Atheists canāt make Moral Judgements because they are not a Religion
Morality does not require religion. Morality only requires a framework. A religious person follows a personalized moral framework based on one put forth by human proxies (ie prophets) that they believe represent the goals and/or ideals of their deity or deities. An atheist can subscribe to the same moral framework, or another. However, they just don’t believe that framework was provided by a superhuman figure.
For example, two people are asked why killing is wrong:
Christian: Because Moses says so, and he was divinely inspired by Yaweh, a superhuman figure that I believe in.
Atheist: Because Moses says so.
An atheist does not have to believe in a higher power to subscribe to a moral framework. In fact, philosophically, the latter position is superior because the first is subject to Euthyphro’s dilemma.
> There are no Universal Atheist Morals
This is a correct statement as there are no universal morals.
> Atheists canāt create a Government
See first answer.
> Atheism is not Science
Correct
> Being an Atheist doesnāt make you more Intelligent than other people
Correct. However, it is statistically true that the smarter you are, the higher the chance you are an atheist. Also, atheists tend to know more about religion than believers, as they have to overcome sociological pressure to believe in a god.
> Atheists have nothing in common but the absence of the presence of a belief in God
Correct.
You seem to really hate atheists. If you are confident in your belief in your god, you shouldn’t have any issue with someone that doesn’t believe what you do. If I believe unicorns exists, the only reason I would get mad at someone that disagrees with me is because of my lack of faith.
What is the “Atheist Framework”?
What are Atheist Morals?
Where is the big book of Atheist Morality? You appear to be an idiot proffering a lot of world salad but incapable of detecting the depths of your own stupidity.
Atheist Logic Fail 
March 5, 2017 at 8:34 pm
Reblogged this on Thought Uncommon.
September 24, 2017 at 7:28 pm
“Atheists canāt make Moral Judgements because they are not a Religion. If they were a Moral Authority they would be a Religion. This would be Self Falsifying.”
– Utter w*nk. Anyone can make moral judgments as long as they have a moral system (e.g. utilitarianism) which they follow. You don’t need a God to make moral judgments. What a stupid thing to say.
“There are no Universal Atheist Morals & if there are please direct me to them.”
– Unlike, of course, the complete Christian consensus on subjects such as condom use and abortion. Whether or not you believe in God (and of course it has to be the right one, doesn’t it? I can see how you feel about Islam), morality is difficult and complex, and if there is one moral absolute that the entire world agrees with and practices in the same way then I’d be staggered. That isn’t an argument for cultural relativism – it’s an admission that morality is more complicated than a neo-Nazi holding a ‘God Hates Fags’ sign makes it out to be. In fact, Westboro baptist is a pretty good example of the fact that there don’t appear to be many Universal Christian Morals either…
“Atheists canāt create a Government because they canāt agree on any Morals which would create the Laws for that Nation.”
– I don’t want to be rude, but this really is a stupid argument. Morality is independent of religion. YOU DON’T NEED TO BE RELIGIOUS TO ESTABLISH A SYSTEM OF MORALITY. Whether you believe morals stem from self-interest, psychological need for community and shelter, some innate moral sense, pure reason, God, or a combination of any and all – it is possible to agree on moral norms within communities, and establish systems of government, without needing religion. There are now more atheists than believers in the UK and yet weirdly we haven’t collapsed into anarchy.
“Atheism is not Science.”
– No one said it was (other than straw men).
“Being an Atheist doesnāt make you more Intelligent than other people.”
– No one said it did (ditto).
“Atheists have nothing in common but the absence of the presence of a belief in God.”
– Unlike Christians, who are all identical in thought and belief? Were you high when you wrote this?!
Your entire point was made much more eloquently by Dostoevsky who stated that without God, everything is permissible. Of course, it isn’t true (and D didn’t really think it was). We might even argue that to be good even without the promise of eternal reward is rather better than being good so you can go to heaven…
September 25, 2017 at 4:16 am
If you understand the concept of Praxis, which you don’t, you can’t assume an authority that you don’t possess. You can falsify your Philosophy by following it and it is wrong or you can falsify your philosophy by not following it. If you don’t state your philosophy, you don’t have a soul because you aren’t at rational human being. You are arbitrary, and therefore an anarchist tyrant.
September 25, 2017 at 4:18 am
Your second comment was a red herring with an arbitrary comparison set in order to make your Non-Answer look viable. I wasn’t impressed at all. I don’t respond to cowardly leading questions or red herrings. Only assertions that don’t conceal their agenda.
September 25, 2017 at 4:20 am
As for your third response you are an idiot who doesn’t understand Neural Myelination and epigenetics. https://atheistfallacies.wordpress.com/tag/homo-naledi/
September 25, 2017 at 4:20 am
And after that last stupidity on your part I refuse to read any more of your responses.
February 3, 2018 at 4:13 am
> Atheists canāt make Moral Judgements because they are not a Religion
Morality does not require religion. Morality only requires a framework. A religious person follows a personalized moral framework based on one put forth by human proxies (ie prophets) that they believe represent the goals and/or ideals of their deity or deities. An atheist can subscribe to the same moral framework, or another. However, they just don’t believe that framework was provided by a superhuman figure.
For example, two people are asked why killing is wrong:
Christian: Because Moses says so, and he was divinely inspired by Yaweh, a superhuman figure that I believe in.
Atheist: Because Moses says so.
An atheist does not have to believe in a higher power to subscribe to a moral framework. In fact, philosophically, the latter position is superior because the first is subject to Euthyphro’s dilemma.
> There are no Universal Atheist Morals
This is a correct statement as there are no universal morals.
> Atheists canāt create a Government
See first answer.
> Atheism is not Science
Correct
> Being an Atheist doesnāt make you more Intelligent than other people
Correct. However, it is statistically true that the smarter you are, the higher the chance you are an atheist. Also, atheists tend to know more about religion than believers, as they have to overcome sociological pressure to believe in a god.
> Atheists have nothing in common but the absence of the presence of a belief in God
Correct.
You seem to really hate atheists. If you are confident in your belief in your god, you shouldn’t have any issue with someone that doesn’t believe what you do. If I believe unicorns exists, the only reason I would get mad at someone that disagrees with me is because of my lack of faith.
February 3, 2018 at 4:18 am
What is the “Atheist Framework”?
What are Atheist Morals?
Where is the big book of Atheist Morality? You appear to be an idiot proffering a lot of world salad but incapable of detecting the depths of your own stupidity.
September 26, 2019 at 9:52 pm
What about Japanese people? Most of them are not religious. Are you saying they do not have morals?
October 1, 2019 at 3:59 am
Since you are stupidly trying to get me to characterize ALL Japanese people they are heavily influenced by Shintoism.