Atheist Logic Fail

learn2science


1 Comment

Innate Morality Fallacy

 

homo-naledi1

If Humans are Innately Moral it is because we exerted a Religious influence on ourselves to become Moral and that Neural Myelination was passed on down to us through Epigenetics.

(CLICK HERE FOR ORIGINAL BLOG)

Innate Morality is a Tacit Moral Equivocation.  If humans are innately moral all human morals are equal.  Cannibalism in Papua New Guinea is moral.  Human Sacrifice is moral. Muslim genocide, slavery, child rape, sex slavery, & Terrorism is moral. 

Atheism is not a Moral Authority and if it was it would be a Religion.  Atheism is Moral and Philosophical Anarchy.  There are no Atheist Morals because Atheists have nothing in common but the absence of a belief in God or the hatred of God. 

A muslim who converts to Atheism still wants Israel destroyed and is comfortable with Christian Genocide.

It is the Laws & Punishments of a Society that make us Moral.  And those can’t be agreed upon by Atheists because they have no Highest Form of the Good or God that they Reveal.  Which is why their has never been & never will be a Great Atheist Civilization.  The most secular nation is Israel with almost 50% Atheists and they’re Constitution is still is inspired by the Talmud. 

 

this is called a draw, in Martial Philosophy.

1 Comment

this is called a draw, in Martial Philosophy.

In martial philosophy it is the act of appearing weak in a certain place, like you have an opening so you can learn about your opponent and their weaknesses. I always thought it was interesting that I could appear to be something that I was not. Now the antitheist trolls are attacking a straw man, that doesn’t exist, but they are participating with the premise that it exists and in doing so are demonstrating the way they are in relationship with it.


Leave a comment

RIGHTS OF MAN FALLACY

Image

 

There is no way to make a rational positive assertion for why humans should have inalienable rights.  You have to presuppose the existence of some sense of self that transcends the individual, some universal law.  If you tried to use evolution or science to do this you would either turn science into a religion or this is what would happen.  

See, science was born of philosophy, so it observes a scientific praxis, and if you can’t support it rationally you can’t say it.  This is called Logic.  In order to do it you would have to contradict yourself and thereby falsify yourself. 

Just-so story

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
In science and philosophy, a just-so story, also called an ad hoc fallacy, is an unverifiable and unfalsifiable narrative explanation for a cultural practice, a biological trait, or behavior of humans or other animals. The pejorative[1] nature of the expression is an implicit criticism that reminds the hearer of the essentially fictional and unprovable nature of such an explanation. Such tales are common in folklore and mythology (where they are known as etiological myths—see etiology).

Image

 

Image

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-so_story

http://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/09/08/the-philosophical-need-for-god/

http://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/09/08/about-christopher-hitchens/

http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/positive-rational-assertions-definition-by-joxuashivah/