Atheist Logic Fail


Argumentum ad Lindman



So you can see how stupid and irrelevant Bruce Lindman is I am going to provide a link to a debate that we are currently having.  Currently, he is denying on this post that he is communicating strategically and doing the very things that I accuse him of doing.  


Author: Joxua Luxor

Known by his online handle Shivah Solomon, he paints as Joxua Mourningstar, he teaches Martial Tai Chi as Master Ten Ton Tiger, writing on occult mysteries he is known as Rabbi Ba'al Shiva, he writes philosophical fiction as Shivastus Solomonicus, and he does comedy as Adam Wolfe.

13 thoughts on “Argumentum ad Lindman

  1. You mean the evidence like thousands of documented transitory fossils? That evidence?

    • lol, you don’t even know what you are talking about. Bruce Lindman is an atheist troll that asks for evidence and then refuses to look at it.

      • I don’t give a shit. I’m just concerned with all of the evidence against the existence of any god and the mountains of evidence, at a simple Google search, of evolution.

      • lol, what is the scientific evidence that God doesn’t exist, please entertain me.

      • The fundamental argument for atheism is that there is no evidence or proof for God. There is no solid or tangible evidence for God nor a logical argument for God. The existence of God is taken on faith and not by evidence.

        -God can not be proven by science which is the main way we study and understand our universe or natural world. There is no theory of God
        -There is no conclusive logical argument forthe existence of God. His/her existence is continuously debated.
        -There is no comprehensive definition of God. There are many definitions for the same God as there are many gods. This is problematic if one is to ascertain the characteristics of God to judge if God exists or not.

      • Evidence for what?
        What evidence did I ask you for? What was the topic?

      • evidence of the existence of god.

      • LOL!
        And where did you supposedly supply this evidence that I supposedly ignored?
        Link, please?

      • I am not going to try to have a rational conversation with you anymore.

      • Argumentum ad Lindman is now updated with a link to our most recent argument for people following the debate. Shouldn’t be a problem for you Bruce unless you are doing something you are ashamed of. Rest assured Bruce, I will nail your fins to the floor and force you to stand your philosophical ground, Merman.

  2. Where is the link to the thread where you claim to have presented evidence of God that I ignored?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s