Atheist Logic Fail

learn2science

Manipulative Cult Leader of the Dawkinites.

7 Comments

Image

In his book “the god delusion” Richard Dawkins quotes another woman to support his assertion that physical abuse is less damaging than emotional abuse.  At that time he was distancing himself from his own stance he also knows that society has a feminine bias and they can get away with saying things that a man can’t.  Being a manipulative, charismatic figure, Dawkins uses his powers of influence to manipulate a group of cheerleaders for science known as Dawkinites.  Seeing science as the antithesis of religion and believing themselves incapable of being religious, they unwittingly are falling victim to Richard Dawkins turning science into a religion, with himself as a kind of martyr/mufti, issuing fatwas against religious proponents and using his Dawkinite henchmen as a type of internet bullying network.  His cult followers seem incapable of detecting his manipulations, obfuscations, and conflations, fallacies and biases, as well as evaluating the depths of their own morbid stupidity.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/09/richard-dawkins-pedophilia_n_3895514.html

In an interview in The Times magazine on Saturday (Sept. 7), Dawkins, 72, he said he was unable to condemn what he called “the mild pedophilia” he experienced at an English school when he was a child in the 1950s.

Referring to his early days at a boarding school in Salisbury, he recalled how one of the (unnamed) masters “pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts.”

He said other children in his school peer group had been molested by the same teacher but concluded: “I don’t think he did any of us lasting harm.”

“I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can’t find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today,” he said.

PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE OF RICHARD DAWKINS

Advertisements

Author: Joxua Luxor

Known by his online handle Shivah Solomon, he paints as Joxua Mourningstar, he teaches Martial Tai Chi as Master Ten Ton Tiger, writing on occult mysteries he is known as Rabbi Ba'al Shiva, he writes philosophical fiction as Shivastus Solomonicus, and he does comedy as Adam Wolfe.

7 thoughts on “Manipulative Cult Leader of the Dawkinites.

  1. Saw this on google images, but I felt I needed to post here that, in fact, Richard Dawkins is not 100% certain God does not exist. He finds it very improbable. As he said, on a scale of 1 to 7, 7 being 100% certain god doesn’t exist, he is a 6. One can never be 100% some sort of God exists, and I’m sure you’ve heard this before, but one can also never be 100% certain that Santa Claus doesn’t exist.

    • Woopsie, correction: “One can never be 100% certain some sort of God exists”*
      Sorry, I’m very picky about those things xD

    • He only says that because he can’t assert it and maintain credibility as a scientist, it is an unscientific statement. He has to observe the Praxis of science.

  2. METAPHYSICS is not science, its philosophy….its defined as “abstract theory with no basis in reality”. You cannot argue against evidence with theory with no basis in reality. If you argue this case using metaphysics then you fundamentally undermine more than science but also the Law, where evidence is used to prove beyond reasonable doubt.

    Your entire wordpress page is an affront to objectivity and logic. But then isn’t it nice that all these engineers, computer scientists, mathematicians and physicists built computers and the internet for you to give your irrational position a voice. What a glorious contrivence your life is.

    • Tell that to the Dawkinites and all of there Malicious slandering meme’s that show nothing but ignorance of the topics they are maligning.
      This page is logical and objective, Richard Dawkins is a creep.
      You are conflating all of my material with one blog on my metaphysics. You tacitly conflate yourself with science with your anonymous comment because you are not willing to put your reputation behind anything you say, and you tacitly bifurcate and suggest that I know nothing about science and have nothing to do with science which you haven’t proven logically or with any reasoning but ex cathedra assertions and as we know based on Hitchens razor, “That which can be asserted without evidence can be rejected without evidence”. You falsify yourself by your own rhetoric and behavior. You are dismissed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s