Atheist Logic Fail




Why Atheism is Unsustainable and Irrational.


Many Atheists use the loophole argument that Atheism is a category and nothing else.  As a category it is not broad enough of a subject to be rational or irrational, but it is preemptive to reason as it’s mind has already been made up on a subject about which not enough is known for that position to be held.  We still know very little about the universe, we can only see a tiny portion of the visible spectrum, we only recently discovered dark matter and dark energy of which the majority of the universe is made.  As such, Atheism is an irrational position, but that isn’t the only problem.


The only thing that atheists have in common with each other is the lack of belief in god.  This isn’t a positive assertion, this is a negation.  The problem arises in the application of a negative position.  Every belief system creates a meritocracy of some sort.  If you say that your god is Reason, it creates a meritocracy of reason and results.  The emergent properties that arise from atheist are unsustainable and irrational.  If you look at what Richard Dawkins did, he created a meritocracy of god hate.


Atheism isn’t science, it isn’t correctness, it isn’t a philosophy, it isn’t morality, all of those things have been conflated with Atheism as a form of propaganda to sell atheism to people, to indoctrinate them into the authority of manipulative and evil people like Richard Dawkins.  Atheists also claim that atheism isn’t an organization even though the Out Campaign is a campaign, and there are now atheist churches.  What manner of Campaign is the Out Campaign?  A military campaign? An advertising campaign?  or a political campaign?  What is the charter or morality of an Atheist church?  Where is it written?   Where can I read it?  What authority do Atheists have to judge the behavior of other atheists as being moral or not?  Richard Dawkins claims that the bible isn’t a reliable source of morality, but then argues that who is to say that Hitler was immoral.  The problem is that Atheists and Richard Dawkins himself are not making positive assertions on what is morality or what morality is?  They are concealing the nature of their morality and their beliefs on what morality is and what their personal morality allows them to do.  How is that sustainable?  How are you going to build a society on that?  What will your constitution be?  What will your laws be?

My personal experiences with Atheists and their meritocracy of being an Atheist shows how hypocritical and essentially evil it is.  Any stupid and incorrect Atheist is considered superior to any person professing any kind of spirituality.  I am a deist, and that is enough to make me the object of ridicule by people much stupider than myself, and they have authority over me.  It is much like the application of Islam where any Muslim no matter how violent and stupid can treat any other person who is not Muslim however they want, treating them as an animal, raping, torturing, beheading, persecuting, etc.  My reasoned and supported arguments are subject to their un-reasoned and incorrect mocking and ridiculing.  Other Atheists will not come to my defense against an atheist even when they know that I am correct and the other atheist is wrong.

Richard Dawkins brand of Atheism is an insidious, and stupid evil.  It is a moral imperative that Dawinites never get into positions of authority in the real world.  They are biased, bigotted, and evil. Atheists use the logical loophole of atheism so that they don’t have to scrutinize themselves or reveal their feelings or thoughts in an honest manner while judging and criticizing others.


Leave a comment

Atheists say all religions are the same. . .


Palestinian Authority (PA) Chairman Mahmoud Abbas’s senior aid Sultan Abu Al-Einen already hailed the Hamas murderer of a baby in Jerusalem on Wednesday as a “hero” – now Abbas’s Fatah party is keeping the terror glorification going.

“The baby was an American citizen,” State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters in a briefing on Thursday. She gave no other details on the infant or the family, citing privacy concerns. U.S. officials in Jerusalem are assisting the family, she added.

Israeli police identified the driver as Adbel-Rahman Shaloudi, 21, a Palestinian man from East Jerusalem, and called the incident a “terrorist attack.”

Hamas has released a statement praising the October 22 terror attack in Jerusalem, which caused the death of three-month old Haya Zissel Braun.  A Hamas spokesman said the attack, carried out by one of its members, is a natural response to Israeli policy in Jerusalem and the city’s Aqsa Mosque.


Featured Image -- 1296

Leave a comment

Parents as Gestalt Models for Gods

Originally posted on THE PSYCHO LINGUIST:


If you think about how children grow up, starting in the womb, vaguely being able to hear their parents voices, Daddy’s voice being lower and less comforting, Mommies voice being more soothing and more present, on an unconscious and sub-conscious level we imprint on our parents as god-like forces and we automatically think that is the way the universe works.  There is an incorrect conceit in the Atheist community that children are born as blank slates, this is the Skinnerian, Behaviorist, model that was falsified by Noam Chomsky, his model has been proved correct repeatedly.  Not to mention Anthropomorphism is a cultural universal.  (

As the child grows they become partial usually to whichever parent is more enabling, this means whichever parent protects their issues and gives them the most things they want.  This is a toxic relationship in which the parents compete against one another for the affections of…

View original 334 more words


Leave a comment



+Joxua Luxor Surely their belief structure, much like your views make up a part of who they are. You simply cannot remove the bread from a sandwich and still call it a sandwich. You’re talking about people and their thoughts, might I remind you.

+Malak The Atheist JMan I believe that if people want to live under Sharia Law, that’s their choice, if they choose not to, again, their choice. The only time it’s right to interfere is when someone asks for help. I’m pretty sure my supporting sovereignty allows for that logic. As far as education goes homey, lol feel free to think whatever you like there. Often I find the people quickest to call you on stupidity are experts in the field.

As far as buying into their religion as peaceful, I don’t have to. I believe in humanity enough and see enough evidence to suggest that socially, we strive for the least chaotic point. That point can be called peace. Religion doesn’t have to be peaceful, as humans natural state is a peaceful one (consider how much of your day you spend peacefully). It’s order (peace) from chaos (individual thought). We are still transitioning socially as we only recently really connected with the rest of the world. Give it time. This is a natural process due to the fact that only an individual can change their own mind. You simply can’t induce it artificially by telling people what they aren’t allowed to think.

Joxua Luxor

Oct 19, 2014
+Dr. Dick Solomon right, their right to take away everybody else’s rights.  They claim to be a persecuted minority everywhere in the civilized world and persecute all monorities wherever they are dominant, you are sadly, malignantly, ignorantly, mis-informed.

SPLC lawyers used this legal strategy to hold the Klan accountable for the acts of its members. In 1981, Dees successfully sued the Ku Klux Klan and won a $7 million judgment for the mother of Michael Donald, a black lynching victim in Alabama.[8][9] Payment of the judgment bankrupted the United Klans of America and resulted in its national headquarters being sold to help satisfy the judgment. All funds secured in this manner were paid to the family of the deceased.”


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers